Have you noticed how the most die-hard supporters of political leaders like Trump or Netanyahu struggle to acknowledge even the slightest criticism of them?
They can recognize flaws in their partners, kids, favorite colleagues, and even the CEOs who have delivered outsized returns for their portfolios. Yet, when it comes to political leaders, there seems to be a striking cognitive dissonance.
Why? Identity politics. For some, their political affiliation becomes so intertwined with their identity that criticism of their candidate feels like a personal attack.
The solution? Belonging.
When we lack belonging we fill that gap with political identity. By cultivating belonging in spaces beyond these faux belonging paths, we’re less likely to feel attacked when our preferred politicians are questioned. More belonging means less polarization—and a healthier society overall.
Comments